About

Launched in March 2003, the Community Development Carbon Fund (CDCF) aimed to contribute to a more equitable regional distribution of carbon finance resources and to achieve social, environmental and economic benefits. In this aim, the CDCF purchased Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) compliant emission reductions (ERs) with a preference for small-scale projects, located in the poorest countries of the world and that provide direct or indirect community benefits. The fund resonated with three global themes: reducing poverty, mitigating climate change and promoting corporate social responsibility.

The CDCF strived to expand the reach of the market and extend the benefits of carbon finance to the poorest countries and poor communities that may otherwise find it difficult to attract carbon finance. With this in mind, the CDCF mandate was to invest at least 25% of the fund resources in green projects located in priority countries—countries designated as Least Developed Countries (LDCs) by the United Nations, or which were eligible for World Bank International Development Association loans.

When the CDCF was established in 2003—two years before the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol – the carbon market was still in its infancy. The CDCF was instrumental in pioneering small-scale projects, new Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) methodologies, and programs of activities (PoAs). One of the CDCF’s founding objectives was to act as a trailblazer for small-scale carbon finance initiatives. Furthermore, the CDCF developed two approved methodologies, and originated a number of ‘firsts’: the first registered PoA in Africa, the first household efficient lighting project worldwide, the first brickkiln project in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and the first CER issuance in Nepal.

Scope of work

The CDCF worked on delivering the following key community benefits:

  • Improving local infrastructure – This category of benefits included a range of activities such as construction of sewage facilities, potable water connections, construction and rehabilitation of local roads, renovations to local schools and health clinics, construction of parks, community centers etc. These benefits were typically provided as part of an additional CBP.
  • Improving access to clean energy for heating and cooking – These projects contributed to providing poor rural households with cleaner and more affordable energy solutions. They also contributed to decreasing the negative impact on health of using firewood or inefficient heating systems.
  • Improving livelihood and employment opportunities – CDCF projects sought to directly benefit the labor force employed in the industry by enhancing sector productivity, job security and increasing incomes. In many cases, employees benefited from year-long employment and equal pay for men and women, often in contrast to the traditional industry norm. Furthermore, most CDCF projects have had some tangential impact on employment creation at the local level, as the construction, operation and maintenance of CDCF projects often entailed the hiring of community residents.
  • Improving access to electricity and energy-efficient lighting – These projects included renewable energy projects (such as micro-hydro and solar) and energy efficient lighting programs that focused on the installation of compact fluorescent lamps. These projects typically provided direct benefits in the form of energy bill savings, as well as increased economic activity due to a more reliable and brighter lighting.

As compared to other Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects, most CDCF projects have been targeted towards communities with high levels of poverty.

The CDCF was unique in that its projects measurably contributed to local community welfare through direct or indirect co-benefits. Such co-benefits were typically meant to arise from the project itself and include contributions to local employment and infrastructure, freeing up financial resources for households, and improving air quality and living conditions. In cases where there were limited or no identifiable benefits integral to the project, a separate Community Benefits Plan (CPB) was prepared in consultation with the identified beneficiary communities. These indirect benefits were typically financed by an additional price premium attached to each credit sold. Activities implemented under the CBPs benefited both men and women in identified communities. Examples of the types of goods and services provided by the CBP include: access to social services and economic infrastructure such as rehabilitation of, and provision of equipment for schools or health clinics, capacity building and training workshops and micro-lending programs.

Objectives

The CDCF strived to:

  • Achieve “development plus carbon credits” by promoting projects that generate both Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) compliant emission reductions through clean technologies and measurable social, environmental and economic benefits for local poor communities;
  • Expand the reach of the carbon market by supporting small-scale projects in the poorest countries while working via local intermediaries (banks, micro-credit organizations and NGOs);
  • Provide learning-by-doing by developing small-scale methodologies for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects to expand the geographical reach and extend the benefits of CDM activity, particularly to poor areas that may otherwise be excluded from carbon finance.

Participants

Public sector
Austria Government of Austria
Canada Government of Canada Public
Luxembourg Government of Luxembourg
Belgium Regional Government of Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium)
Government of the Walloon Region (Belgium)
Netherlands Government of The Netherlands
Italy Government of Italy
Spain Government of Spain
Public/Private sector
Denmark Danish Carbon Fund
Private sector
Germany BASF     
Goteborg Energi AB
KFW BankenGruppe
Spain Gas Natural Fenosa
HC Energia         
Endesa
Japan The Okinawa Electric Power Company Inc. (OEPC)
Daiwa Securities Capital Markets Co. Ltd
Idemitsy Kosan Co., Ltd.              
FujiFilm Corporation
JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation
Finland Rautaruukki OYJ
Portugal Electricidade De Portugal (EDP)
Norway Stakraft Carbon Invest AS
StatOil ASA
Switzerland Swiss RE

Fund publications

Download

Portfolio projects